The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the first clear sign of hunting is now you go forward to Homo erectus so now you're 1.8 million years ago and now we see a much better tool it's called annejulien tool it's by facial if you found that you instantly know oh wow this is carved by somebody you know a great effort it's not easy to carve a rock and those things we're definitely used for dismembering animal carcasses
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.