The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I expect it in the future as Moore's law and computers get faster and faster you can actually do a lot of this stuff computationally and make it much faster and the goal to really be to actually have these scans that we're doing you know under half an hour even faster and it can be done from a physics point of view it's not a technological barrier even with the magnet that you have even at 1.5 yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.