The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the CDC the Center for Disease Control have looked at the last two years cost of life of people you know with different stuff so they looked at people who died at 70 and after 100 and the cost of dying after 100 was third of that of dying in 70
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the medical cost of the last two years of life by the way in centenarians the cdcs data in centenarians the the last two years life are third the cost in 100 years old than in when you die in 70.
in centenarians the cdcs data in centenarians the the last two years life are third the cost in 100 years old than in when you die in 70.
the the medical cost that the last two years of life by the way in centenarians the CDC has data in centenarians the the last two years life are third the cost in 100 years old than in when you die in 70