The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
last year's cars had so much aerodynamics that once they hit about 70 maybe even 60 miles per hour i think it was actually less than 100 kph so call it 50 to 60 miles per hour they were generating downforce that exceeded their weight think about what that means at less than 100 kilometers per hour they could be driving upside down that's how much downforce they generate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.