The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But without the SRY gene, those undifferiated gonads will differentiate in the female direction to form ovaries. So, so I remember my overly simplistic and this is almost 30 years ago, but I could have sworn I used to think about this in the embryology class as by default we are female and this gene had to turn on to basically take the X-wise and make them male phenotypically.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.