The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think there's a paper on mid archive or bio archive out this week on non-human primates showing that once you're infected they're immune to reinfection whether that's applicable to humans is hard to know but I'm gonna work on the premise that that exposure infection will probably confirm immunity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there probably is durable immunity at least for the short term and what I mean by that is there was a study completed and published last week using macaque monkeys and they infected a group of them with the virus they all came down with kind of the classic corona virus like illness they then waited until they fully recovered they reach allenge them a month later and all of them are protected against under each a lunge none of them got infected again