The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think that we have to be very careful to not to not ignore to not forsake the people who are continuing to suffer we have to keep asking these questions if someone is eating a diet containing kale or spinach collard greens and they're thriving who am i to tell them why they changed how to change their diet i would never do that but i think these discussions remain critically important for the people that are not well that continue to suffer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.