The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
just diversity scores tell us nothing about the health of the microbiome and we can have a lot of diversity with a lot of bad bacteria like I said earlier we know what the bad ones are you can have a high diversity score and I've seen this and have tons of Proteobacteria around so having a high diversity score does not mean that you're healthy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.