The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at you know do the math and just a little over 300 million people if you're talking about 60% of those infected you're talking 170 to 175 million people if you talk about 80 percent of those having relatively milder illness now you're talking twenty percent that are going to have some illness will likely require hospitalization if you then take that down to even one or two percent of those who might die
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.