The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we need to be able to understand relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction in not just vaccine trials but all pharma trials nutritional interventions anything um that involves an uh an intervention this type of stuff is going to be helpful
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a lot of times it's only reported as a relative risk but I I think you and I have harped on this in the past which is you can't really talk about relative risk without knowing absolute risk