We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Some of the first generation clocks are worse than chronologic age. Your passport is better than they are at predicting mortality, which to me means that they're not useful because, you know, even if they're not designed to predict mortality, if they don't capture some element of that, what are they measuring?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Some of the first generation clocks are worse than chronologic age. Your passport is better than they are at predicting mortality, which to me means that they're not useful because, you know, even if they're not designed to predict mortality, if they don't capture some element of that, what are they measuring?