The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what they do at White Oak is they have cows on the land right see when what people don't realize is that when you have animals living on the land you create a fertile soil and plants that grow just mightily they grow so well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a real difference between plant agriculture and animal agriculture and what people also fail to appreciate is that the way to have healthy plants is to put animals on the land because the poop and the pee from animals is what makes the soil healthy and then you get amazing plants