Peter Attia· MD
those two i think really took it to the next jumped it to the next level which is can we understand why this is happening
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
those two i think really took it to the next jumped it to the next level which is can we understand why this is happening
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there was really I think the next big Advance was when Roy Walford got into it who was very interested not just in how mice age but how that might tell him something about human aging and Ed masero another researcher who followed up on rats and those two I think really took it to the next jumped it to the next level which is can we understand why this is happening
those two I think really took it to the next jumped it to the next level which is can we understand why this is happening