The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I feel it's us the little guy if we have our own copy and we can say well actually look this is what I said then yeah that was taken out of context yeah yeah that was taken out of context and I can do it I have an assistant I can just find it and find exactly and find all the times I said it I think that's that's good
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I feel it's us the little guy if we have our own copy and we can say well actually look this is what I said then yeah that was taken out of context yeah yeah that was taken out of context and I can do it I have an assistant I can just find it and find exactly and find all the time that said it I think that's that's good