Paul Saladino· MD
perhaps short telomeres are a proxy for higher levels of deuterium in the chromatin yes i say that because as they say it's a proxy for age it's not it's a proxy really for the amount your inability to the palete deuterium
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
perhaps short telomeres are a proxy for higher levels of deuterium in the chromatin yes i say that because as they say it's a proxy for age it's not it's a proxy really for the amount your inability to the palete deuterium
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the lengthening and shortening of telomeres may not actually be due to the number of base pairs or actual chromatin in the telomere but the bunching you call the tunneling this idea that deuterium can gather other hydrogen atoms to it and sort of like a molecular magnetism it's not proper physics to say that but it's like a it's an attractive force and it can cause a telemeter bunch
if people really wanted to get longer telomeres which is probably a good thing they should think about deuterium levels in their bodies how to deplete them etc and then retest