The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
at our current carbon dioxide level of 400 parts per million the area under this curve which is an indication of how much the earth's radiation heat radiation is able to move into space is 274 watts per square meter excuse me 277 watts per square meter
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if there were no greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere there would be this amount of transmission of heat into the uh space from the earth which is 394 watts per square meter
the area under the jagged black curve is the radiation of the earth really radiates the space uh it's 277 watts per square meter compared to almost 400 if there were no greenhouse gases