Rhonda Patrick· PhD
But to go out and say that simply because there are deaths, that that must mean that the vaccine is causing deaths. I think that is disingenuous and not supported by the data.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
But to go out and say that simply because there are deaths, that that must mean that the vaccine is causing deaths. I think that is disingenuous and not supported by the data.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Otherwise, this is like the worst epidemiology data you could ever imagine without any correction for confounding factors.