The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so so now that would be that would be a false negative right so exactly the lower there yeah so yeah there might be an effect but you're not going to see it so so this false negative rate um we typically allow to be a larger number it's typically between 10 and 20 percent and what that means is the the the the the the flip side of that is we have 80 to 90 percent power because one minus that accepted false negative rate is called your power
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.