Peter Attia· MD
so we're actually combining the anatomic and functional and that's where just like then PET CT where that famous 1+1 equals 3 is exactly what we're doing and the beauty of it is there's absolutely no radiation
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we're actually combining the anatomic and functional and that's where just like then PET CT where that famous 1+1 equals 3 is exactly what we're doing and the beauty of it is there's absolutely no radiation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.