The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and you ask what is the primary indication it's pain I don't care I see patients all the time who come in who have the ugliest x-rays you've ever seen two or your point about the cervical spine which is so important they have no pain and they can do whatever they want to do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and you ask what is the primary indication it's pain I don't care I see patients all the time who come in who have the ugliest x-rays you've ever seen
so they get two there's two reasons they come dysfunction because they can't do what they desperately want to do whether it's recreational or work sometimes and number two pain uh either one of those is a solid indication for it when the radiographic findings are there