The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
once you commit to doing something it's the inertia to do it is huge right and you can always just say look there's an asymmetry in this decision to not have surgery doesn't remove any options you get to have surgery again later if it was the right thing to do yes once you have surgery it's not that you can't have surgery again but the operative field never looks the same a second time that's a very good and so you want to keep in mind the asymmetry of a pause
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
once you commit to doing something it's the inertia to do it is huge right and you can always just say look there's an asymmetry in this decision to not have surgery doesn't remove any options you get to have surgery again later if it was the right thing to do