The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so what isotropic basically means is that it more bassy slicing you in cubes so a one by one by one millimeter cube for example and the power of actually doing that one by one by one is that you can now look at things again in three dimensions in any direction you want the detail and resolution is perfect and so that's what isotropic means
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.