The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what you would see is guys in the middle of the bridge with their hearts racing because they're terrified would do some misinterpretation why is my heart beating so much faster than if I was standing safely so they would rate her more attractively in the middle of the bridge
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
then was the ceiling of detail is now you do the same experiment and you give the person a beta blocker so that they don't have the accelerator and they don't rate the person as attractive is it the same with the beta blocker you get treat you you do nothing to their ratings of them is how smart they seem how kind they seem whatever it's just this okay if my heart's racing it must be because