The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other thing is when I'm examining somebody who's got a joint problem their hip hurts and I torque on it I'm done I won't be able to really test anything else because everything I do will hurt so it's important not only to do that in a sort of a gentle way but also if I'm suspecting something in particular I do that last
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I will change the order of the exam based on what I think it is based on the history that I took based on the gate exam based on the standing exam
if I'm examining somebody who's got a joint problem their hip hurts and I torque on it I'm done I won't be able to really test anything else because everything I do will hurt so it's important not only to do that in a sort of a gentle way but also if I'm suspecting something in particular I do that last