The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
however the point point I want to really make is comparing the sematic mutations of cancer to the germline mutations of autism and the point I'm trying to make is that when you've met a woman with breast cancer you've met a woman with breast cancer you're not going to find too many women that look the same with breast cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the genes that are implicated in autism are indeed germline you're born with them