The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you are putting pesticides is it glyphosate or some other pesticide which is water soluble and leading into the water table and is ending up in our water table so now you're harming everything downstream of that whether it's animals um anything else in the life cycle that is eating those animals is going to bioaccumulate the glyphosate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.