The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
medicare decided they're not going to pay for a catastrophic medical mistake what we call a never event something that should never happen regardless of the circumstances you should never leave an instrument or a sponge behind during surgery unintentionally and what year was that marty that medicare said that 2008
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and two years later after the pronovost publication on the central line toolkit or bundle which within three years was becoming standard in many icus around the country medicare decided they're not going to pay for a catastrophic medical mistake what we call a never event something that should never happen regardless of the circumstances you should never leave an instrument or a sponge behind during surgery unintentionally