Peter Attia· MD
so again we've already talked about it the pulmonary epithelium requires them to be smaller than 2.5 microns um and in the lining of the gut it could probably be as big as 150 microns to be absorbed
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so again we've already talked about it the pulmonary epithelium requires them to be smaller than 2.5 microns um and in the lining of the gut it could probably be as big as 150 microns to be absorbed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.