Peter Attia· MD
so that monotonic benefits assumption I could find no evidence of it it's like never shown up in a study of anything unless it's an extremely simple task that everyone master is very very quickly
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so that monotonic benefits assumption I could find no evidence of it it's like never shown up in a study of anything unless it's an extremely simple task that everyone master is very very quickly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is something called the monotonic benefits assumption and essentially if you have two people have never done something for every equal unit of practice they should progress exactly the same amount so it's everyone's practice response is the same is one of the assumptions underlying it and I start how can that be it's not to say it's not would be an interesting conclusion rather but how could that even be the null hypothesis it seems so counterintuitive