Peter Attia· MD
that seems like a very viable scenario and the biggest challenge to that is that very few stones have been left unturned in the search for what those animals might be and yet that has turned up empty-handed
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that seems like a very viable scenario and the biggest challenge to that is that very few stones have been left unturned in the search for what those animals might be and yet that has turned up empty-handed
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as of now which is you know directionally call it a year and nine months post the first infection we don't yet have an identified intermediary host
that seems like a very viable scenario and the biggest challenge to that is that very few stones have been left unturned in the search for what those animals might be and yet that has turned up empty-handed