The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i wish at the time i had the thought and wherewithal to have taken muscle biopsies and collected you know ample amounts of tissue for all the future proteomics metabolomics every omic you can think of to have been done down the line it still would have only been an n of one
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i wish at the time i had the thought and wherewithal to have taken muscle biopsies and collected you know ample amounts of tissue for all the future proteomics metabolomics every omic you can think of to have been done down the line it still would have only been an n of one