The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
it's far less likely that the differences between people who experience baldness and those who do not is the generation of more DHT in other words it's probably not something that results in the increase in five Alpha reductase conversion to DHT
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even a person who has low 5 Alpha reductase activity which would be genetically determined still makes sufficient DHT that if their follicles are sensitive they're going to ultimately end up losing it
genetic sensitivity to DHT appears far more important than absolute DHT level
it all comes down to the sensitivity of the given follicles to DHT