The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we know that tension in any tissue induces those same androgen cofactors for the androgen receptor and induces transforming growth factor beta 1. if that tension is persistent and high enough it translocates out of those cell sites and presumably can enter and begin to influence cells above them like the dermal papillai cell network
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know that tension in any tissue induces those same androgen cofactors for the androgen receptor and induces transforming growth factor beta 1 if that tension is persistent and high enough it translocates out of those cell sites and presumably can enter and begin to influence cells above them like the dermal papillai cell network