The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there's methods now that can find cancers at an earlier point and a broad array of cancers like Way Beyond just the two the cancer types that we're talking about I mean the ones for which we have screening methods I mean um so really kind of you know almost pan cancer tests but in r d mode right behind them are you know 10x 100x more sensitive methods that are are absolutely going to move the needle in terms of our ability to find cancers um at a microscopic Point um
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's methods now that can find cancers at an earlier point and a broad array of cancers like Way Beyond just the two the cancer types that we're talking about I mean the ones for which we have screening methods I mean um so really kind of you know almost pan cancer tests
but I think that technology is coming down the road and it may not be too many more years when the average person is getting a Blood Plus on on the early detection side of things