The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And it's a fantastic system to study aging because, well, one it's transparent. So you can actually see the tissues aging in real time day after day. But two, it lives a very short time. It lives about 15 to 20 days, and that's the big advantage because you can go through lots and lots of experiments very, very quickly, fairly economically, and therefore, you can study lots of compounds and look for things that extend lifespan.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.