The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the beauty about those embryonic stem cells they do something that no other cell had ever done and that is you could take it it could become a liver or a heart or a you know pancreas you could kind of channel it in those directions and the second thing it was like a back in those days would say it's like a copying machine you can make unlimited copies of it no other cell ever in the history of man had we discovered
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.