The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how many genes by the way when we do a a breast cancer genetic screen how many known genes are we looking for so interestingly uh it's a little bit of allart so what I mean by that is it's the your choice it's your choice either as a doctor ordering the test it's your choice is a patient that's getting the test
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so for round numbers 50 is a good number when you're trying to be really comprehensive if you said just give me the focused breast cancer things it might be more like 10.