The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if I look at your hand there's three places that look for atrophy I look over here and I see that that's plump and not flattened out and what it'll do is it'll look like a gaunt um you know face and then over here I look here this also can develop a an atrophy there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if it starts to flatten or even be soft when you palpate it then we worry about the nerve not enough nerve signal going to that and developing the early atrophy
very importantly looking at the thenar muscles we want to see a nice plump convex surface if it starts to flatten or even just be soft when you palpate it then we worry about the nerve not enough nerve signal going to that and developing the early atrophy