The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the estimates for coronavirus are 2.2 to 3.4 for the are not so the combination of being moderately transmissible and being more deadly more virulent having a case fatality rate that's higher than the flu make this more of a big deal than the flu which is why things are happening the way they are it's the combination of infectivity and virulence that we're trying to figure out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.