The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so just discussing TR and TE how do they differ in acquiring a t1-weighted image which is the one that's really anatomically beautiful it's the closest thing you see to Wow I know what I'm looking at it and I'm not a radiologist versus the t2-weighted image which seems to highlight water more so things that are water look more white but it doesn't have the anatomic resolution
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.