The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are multiple studies that show that in hunter-gatherer groups like the Hansa there is no bifida bacteria so any conception of what is good or bad bacteria like I said we can pretty much tell what the bad ones are but we don't know what looks good and you definitely don't need Bifidobacterium eat because the hodza don't even have it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.