The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
um I guess there's a there's a gene therapy out there where um you you introduce a vector to somebody and you I don't think you fully silence but you you clearly attenuate actually no I'm sorry you activate the gene for ftin that makes more of the ftin protein which inhibits uh the expression of the myostatin gene or maybe inhibits the protein myostatin one or the other
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
follistatin is a gene that expresses A protein that protein then goes on to inhibit another protein called myostatin and myostatin inhibits muscle growth during development so the theoretical argument is if you do this gene therapy to — enhance fallatin make more fallatin you would inhibit myostatin you would have larger muscles