The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one study investigating the relationship between blood group and the Koba 19 susceptibility it was found that people with blood group a have a higher risk for acquiring Koba 19 compared to non A blood groups whereas blood groups Oh have a significantly lower risk for the infection compared to non Oh blood groups
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
based on some very small studies just very limited evidence there is some indication that people with blood group a may have a higher risk of acquiring cobra 19 compared to non a blood groups whereas individuals with blood type O may have a lower risk of the infection compared to non Oh blood groups
this means that people with type O blood can donate blood to a person with any blood type since their blood cells do not express either A or B antigen it will not elicit an immune response but they can only receive blood from a person with type O since they make antibodies against a and B antigens so again this very preliminary data suggest that people with type O blood may be less susceptible to Coba 19 because they produce the type A antibodies which are possibly inhibiting the interaction between SARS Kove - and the AC receptor