The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
but the our environment on the face of this earth has always had greenhouse gases if we did not have a greenhouse gas in the environment then the surface of the earth would be like negative 20 degrees so it would be like the moon it would be too cold so we need greenhouse gases
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so there is some level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that is necessary for life on this planet
so there's a substantial uh uh decrease in the cooling of the earth due to greenhouse gases and thank god for that that's what keeps us warm enough to live on earth
without greenhouse gases the surface of the earth would always be around the freezing temperature of water or perhaps colder so we need some greenhouse gases
without greenhouse gases the surface of the earth would always be around the freezing temperature of water or perhaps colder so we need some greenhouse gases