The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how old what is the oldest fire relic that you're aware of about 300 000 years right and when i look at homo habilis homo erectus and homo sapiens which was certainly around 300 000 years ago but homo erectus and homo habilis 1.5 parenthropus one you know two million years ago this changing of the australopithecine lineage the rib cages began to change even then and the rib angles so if you look at the growth of the human brain it began two million years ago
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.