The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
without gluconeogenesis we're not going to wake up in the morning because it's gluconeogenesis that supplies glucose for the cns while we're sleeping and certainly during starvation without this process we're in trouble i don't think that can be overstated by the way let's go back to what you just said we couldn't survive by my calculation jerry we'd have a hard time surviving 10 minutes without gluconeogenesis as a species
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
without gluconeogenesis to regulate glucose homeostasis it's critical for life function