The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this technology was developed for um telescopes that have to contend with atmospheric distortion so the way this works is that telescopes and i'm talking about like keck the best ones in the world they send up a diagnostic laser into the atmosphere and the distortion that that laser is encountering is adjusted for in real time with a deformable mirror a very thin mirror and that allows them to essentially correct for the distortions of the atmosphere in real time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this technology was developed for um telescopes that have to contend with atmospheric distortion so the way this works is that telescopes and i'm talking about like keck the best ones in the world they send up a diagnostic laser into the atmosphere and the distortion that that laser is encountering is adjusted for in real time with a deformable mirror a very thin mirror and that allows them to essentially correct for the distortions of the atmosphere in real time