The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are a couple of holdout special forces branches where they don't want you to be a you know i think a maybe an army ranger and that has to do with getting poked in the eye and the possibility that a flap could be damaged and some of this is sort of vestigial lore and it's hard to change the military's rules but they'll just say prk or nothing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there used to be some restrictions in branches of the military i remember that you couldn't have a flap in your eye if you were a pilot that all went away uh so pretty much every all the aviators and pilots can now have lasik or prk