Paul Saladino· MD
that this is the number one factor the driver of the lifespan of why a mile a lives only a few years whereas we live you know 70 or 80 or whatever it is
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that this is the number one factor the driver of the lifespan of why a mile a lives only a few years whereas we live you know 70 or 80 or whatever it is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what they found essentially is that these organisms that have the high metabolic rate they don't have a really efficient metabolic rate they have a very inefficient capacity for energy production this is because they have more unsaturated membranes they have more polyunsaturated fats in the membranes of their mitochondria of the plasma membranes and so they waste so much energy dealing with this dealing with you know restoring the sodium pottassium gradient and trying to produce ATP when there's you know they can't do it as efficiently that this is the number one factor the driver of the lifespan of why a m a mouse lives only a few years whereas we live you know 70 or 80 or whatever it is