The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so SARS one the original one was highly lethal and if you had it you were sick as hell and you were going into the hospital in the ICU and that meant that you didn't have a lot of people walking around transmitting SARS one and that's the reasons it tended to burn out pretty quickly although could cause serious nosocomial outbreaks and hospitals
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.